On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 07:36:57AM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote: > So, like, the other day Segher Boessenkool mumbled: > > > Property names have been limited to start with > > > characters from the set [a-zA-Z,._#?]. That is, the > > > digits and the expression symbols have been removed. > > > > This cannot work; many property names start with a digit, > > for example. > > Are any of those property names in use in any > of our DTS files or b-w-o.txt? Not really, no. > In fact, with this lexical change, all of our > DTS files still produce byte-identical results. > > I really think this is one of those areas where > we may need to stray from the other guideline. > > Is there a compelling reason somewhere? Really?
We may have deprecated te '64-bit' and '32-64-bridge' properties in cpu nodes for the flattened tree, but it already exists in a great number of Apple and IBM trees. It would be poor form for dtc to choke on these trees. -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev