Matt Sealey wrote: > Valentine, > > Please do the very minimal required to keep supporting the Efika. > > As for an little endian OHCI controller on an OF bus, I would not > consider it an impossibility. But, not having the big-endian > property fixes this; OHCI is little-endian by default. You need > only report "difference" in device trees, overzealous naming of > a billion kinds of 99.99999% compatible controllers is just a > waste of space. > > I prefer the new binding to a degree. I like the big-endian property > and I like the reporting of a standard controller type (usb-ohci > rather than building in chip names). However by making the driver > support only the recommending binding, we break old platforms for > the sake of making new ones cleaner. > > I wish someone would have sat down and defined the 5200 device > tree in a design committee rather than a peer review post-commit > system. In fact, that is a great idea, we can start this off with > the MPC5121E right now, and get the damn thing RIGHT. >
OK, I'll submit a new patch in a bit. Thanks, Valentine. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev