On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:55:03 -0700 Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 14:11 -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote: > > > > Well, We don't need arch-specific remove_memory() for ia64 and ppc64. > > x86_64, I don't know. We will know, only when some one does the > > verification. I don't need arch_remove_memory() hook also at this > > time. > > I wasn't being very clear. I say, add the arch hook only if you need > it. But, for now, just take the ia64 code and make it generic. > remove_memory() has been arch-specific since there was no piece of unplug code. And I didn't merge it to be generic when I implemented ia64 ver. Hmm...I have no objection to merge them. But let's see how memory hotremove for ppc64 works for a while. We can merge them later. I'm glad to have new testers :) Thanks, -Kame _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev