On Thursday 06 December 2007, Ishizaki Kou wrote: > > An interesting question still is how close the native celleb machine > > definition is to the one from platforms/cell/setup.c. Maybe it's best > > to have a common machine definition for these two in the end. > > You know celleb-native is between celleb-beat and cell blade. I also > think it's best if we can use a common machine definition and a common > setup code. But there are many differences mainly caused by their > firmwares, and this disturbs the integration. I think celleb-native is > closer to celleb-beat than to cell blade. So I put celleb-native code > in platforms/celleb.
Ok, fine with me then. Thanks, Arnd <>< _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev