On 4/5/16 3:02 AM, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
Some of these tests proved useful with the powerpc eBPF JIT port due to
sign-extended 16-bit immediate loads. Though some of these aspects get
covered in other tests, it is better to have explicit tests so as to
quickly tag the precise problem.
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <a...@fb.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <da...@davemloft.net>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ana...@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <pau...@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n....@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Makes sense. Looks like ppc jit will be using quite a bit of
available ppc instructions. Nice.
I'm assuming all these new tests passed with x64 jit?
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <a...@kernel.org>
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
