On 2016/04/28 07:38PM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > We're approaching 20 locations where we need to check for ELF ABI v2. > That's fine, except the logic is a bit awkward, because we have to check > that _CALL_ELF is defined and then what its value is. > > So check it once in asm/types.h and define PPC_ELF_ABI_v2 when ELF ABI > v2 is detected. > > We don't add explicit includes of asm/types.h because it's included > basically everywhere via compiler.h. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au>
Thanks for doing this! Does it make sense to call this PPC64_ELF_ABI_V2 since this is 64-bit only, and include check for CONFIG_PPC64 as well? Apart from that: Acked-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n....@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - Naveen _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
