So, like, the other day David Gibson mumbled:
> Ah, I think I sent it by private mail, so it won't be in patchwork.
> Here you are:
Ah, that explains it.
> dtc/libfdt: Add README clarifying licensing
>
> The fact the dtc are distributed together, but have different licenses
> can be a bit confusing. Several people have enquired as to what the
> deal is with the libfdt licensing, so this patch adds a README
> clarifying the situation with a rationale.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
After correcting the log-message English a bit, it was applied.
The fact that the dtc and libfdt are distributed together, but have
different licenses, can be a bit confusing. Several people have
enquired as to what the deal is with the libfdt licensing, so this
patch adds a README clarifying the situation with a rationale.
To be in agreement in the record, I too signed off on that patch.
Objections to either, please let me know!
Thanks,
jdl
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
