On Friday 16 September 2016 04:33 PM, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 18:32:00 +0530
Madhavan Srinivasan <ma...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
Make it explicit the interrupt masking supported
by a gievn interrupt handler. Patch correspondingly
extends the MASKABLE_* macros with an addition's parameter.
"bitmask" parameter is passed to SOFTEN_TEST macro to decide
on masking the interrupt.
Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <ma...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/exception-64s.h | 62 ++++++++++++++++----------------
arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S | 36 ++++++++++++-------
2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/exception-64s.h
b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/exception-64s.h
index 1eea4ab75607..41be0c2d7658 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/exception-64s.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/exception-64s.h
@@ -179,9 +179,9 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_NESTED(ftr,ftr,943)
* checking of the interrupt maskable level in the SOFTEN_TEST.
* Intended to be used in MASKABLE_EXCPETION_* macros.
*/
-#define __EXCEPTION_PROLOG_1(area, extra, vec) \
+#define __EXCEPTION_PROLOG_1(area, extra, vec, bitmask)
\
__EXCEPTION_PROLOG_1_PRE(area); \
- extra(vec); \
+ extra(vec, bitmask); \
__EXCEPTION_PROLOG_1_POST(area);
/*
Is __EXCEPTION_PROLOG_1 now for maskable exceptions, and EXCEPTION_PROLOG_1
for unmaskable? Does it make sense to rename __EXCEPTION_PROLOG_1 to
MASKABLE_EXCEPTION_PROLOG_1? Reducing the mystery underscores in this file would
be nice!
Yes. That is true. Will make the changes.
Maddy
This worked out nicely with mask bit being passed in by the exception handlers.
Very neat.
Thanks.
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npig...@gmail.com>
