Alexander Stein wrote:
-               schedule_timeout(2);
+               schedule_timeout(msecs_to_jiffies(2));

NACK.

So I don't remember why I wrote this code, but I don't think I was expecting it to be 2ms. Instead, I think I just wanted it to be some delay, but I believed that schedule_timeout(1) was too short or would be "optimized" out somehow.

Note that right below this, I do:

        if (qe_port->wait_closing) {
                /* Wait a bit longer */
                set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
                schedule_timeout(qe_port->wait_closing);
        }

And wait_closing is a number of jiffies, so I knew that schedule_timeout() took jiffies as a parameter.

So I think I'm going to NACK this patch, since I believe I knew what I was doing when I wrote it five years ago.

Reply via email to