Hi Greg,

First of all thanks for your reply.

On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 03:14:12PM -0700, Till Smejkal wrote:
> 
> There's no way with that many cc: lists and people that this is really
> making it through very many people's filters and actually on a mailing
> list.  Please trim them down.

I am sorry that the patch's cc-list is too big. This was the list of people 
that the
get_maintainers.pl script produced. I already recognized that it was a huge 
number of
people, but I didn't want to remove anyone from the list because I wasn't sure 
who
would be interested in this patch set. Do you have any suggestion who to remove 
from
the list? I don't want to annoy anyone with useless emails.

> Minor sysfs questions/issues:
> 
> > +struct vas {
> > +   struct kobject kobj;            /* < the internal kobject that we use *
> > +                                    *   for reference counting and sysfs *
> > +                                    *   handling.                        */
> > +
> > +   int id;                         /* < ID                               */
> > +   char name[VAS_MAX_NAME_LENGTH]; /* < name                             */
> 
> The kobject has a name, why not use that?

The reason why I don't use the kobject's name is that I don't restrict the 
names that
are used for VAS/VAS segments. Accordingly, it would be allowed to use a name 
like
"foo/bar/xyz" as VAS name. However, I am not sure what would happen in the 
sysfs if I
would use such a name for the kobject. Especially, since one could think of 
another
VAS with the name "foo/bar" whose name would conflict with the first one 
although it
not necessarily has any connection with it.

> > +
> > +   struct mutex mtx;               /* < lock for parallel access.        */
> > +
> > +   struct mm_struct *mm;           /* < a partial memory map containing  *
> > +                                    *   all mappings of this VAS.        */
> > +
> > +   struct list_head link;          /* < the link in the global VAS list. */
> > +   struct rcu_head rcu;            /* < the RCU helper used for          *
> > +                                    *   asynchronous VAS deletion.       */
> > +
> > +   u16 refcount;                   /* < how often is the VAS attached.   */
> 
> The kobject has a refcount, use that?  Don't have 2 refcounts in the
> same structure, that way lies madness.  And bugs, lots of bugs...
> 
> And if this really is a refcount (hint, I don't think it is), you should
> use the refcount_t type.

I actually use both the internal kobject refcount to keep track of how often a
VAS/VAS segment is referenced and this 'refcount' variable to keep track how 
often
the VAS is actually attached to a task. They not necessarily must be related to 
each
other. I can rename this variable to attach_count. Or if preferred I can
alternatively only use the kobject reference counter and remove this variable
completely though I would loose information about how often the VAS is attached 
to a
task because the kobject reference counter is also used to keep track of other
variables referencing the VAS.

> > +/**
> > + * The sysfs structure we need to handle attributes of a VAS.
> > + **/
> > +struct vas_sysfs_attr {
> > +   struct attribute attr;
> > +   ssize_t (*show)(struct vas *vas, struct vas_sysfs_attr *vsattr,
> > +                   char *buf);
> > +   ssize_t (*store)(struct vas *vas, struct vas_sysfs_attr *vsattr,
> > +                    const char *buf, size_t count);
> > +};
> > +
> > +#define VAS_SYSFS_ATTR(NAME, MODE, SHOW, STORE)                            
> > \
> > +static struct vas_sysfs_attr vas_sysfs_attr_##NAME =                       
> > \
> > +   __ATTR(NAME, MODE, SHOW, STORE)
> 
> __ATTR_RO and __ATTR_RW should work better for you.  If you really need
> this.

Thank you. I will have a look at these functions.

> Oh, and where is the Documentation/ABI/ updates to try to describe the
> sysfs structure and files?  Did I miss that in the series?

Oh sorry, I forgot to add this file. I will add the ABI descriptions for future
submissions.

> > +static ssize_t __show_vas_name(struct vas *vas, struct vas_sysfs_attr 
> > *vsattr,
> > +                          char *buf)
> > +{
> > +   return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%s", vas->name);
> 
> It's a page size, just use sprintf() and be done with it.  No need to
> ever check, you "know" it will be correct.

OK. I was following the sysfs example in the documentation that used scnprintf, 
but
if sprintf is preferred, I can change this.

> Also, what about a trailing '\n' for these attributes?

I will change this.

> Oh wait, why have a name when the kobject name is already there in the
> directory itself?  Do you really need this?

See above.

> > +/**
> > + * The ktype data structure representing a VAS.
> > + **/
> > +static struct kobj_type vas_ktype = {
> > +   .sysfs_ops = &vas_sysfs_ops,
> > +   .release = __vas_release,
> 
> Why the odd __vas* naming?  What's wrong with vas_release?

I was using the __* naming scheme for functions that have no other meaning 
outside of
my source file. But I can change this if people don't like it. I have no strong
feelings about the names of the functions.

> > +   .default_attrs = vas_default_attr,
> > +};
> > +
> > +
> > +/***
> > + * Internally visible functions
> > + ***/
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * Working with the global VAS list.
> > + **/
> > +static inline void vas_remove(struct vas *vas)
> 
> <snip>
> 
> You have a ton of inline functions, for no good reason.  Make them all
> "real" functions please.  Unless you can measure the size/speed
> differences?  If so, please say so.

There was no specific reason why I declared the functions as inline except my 
hope to
reduce the function call for some of my very small functions. I can look more 
closely
at this and check whether there is some real benefit in inlining them and if not
remove it.

Thank you very much.

Till

Reply via email to