On Mon, 20 Mar 2017 21:24:15 +0530 "Gautham R. Shenoy" <e...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <e...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > Move the piece of code in powernv/smp.c::pnv_smp_cpu_kill_self() which > transitions the CPU to the deepest available platform idle state to a > new function named pnv_cpu_offline() in powernv/idle.c. The rationale > behind this code movement is that the data required to determine the > deepest available platform state resides in powernv/idle.c. > > Signed-off-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <e...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Looks good. As a nitpick, possibly one or two variables in idle.c could become static (pnv_deepest_stop_psscr_*). Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npig...@gmail.com>