On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 16:34 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 04:07 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote: > > Changelog > > > > 1. Get rid of the constant 5 (based on comments from > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > 2. Implement suggestions from Olof Johannson > > 3. Check if cmdline is NULL in fake_numa_create_new_node() > > > > Tested with additional parameters from Olof > > > > numa=debug,fake= > > numa=foo,fake=bar > > > I'm not sure why yet, but git bisect tells me it's this patch that's > causing the for-2.6.25 tree to explode on boot on cell machines.
This fixes it, although I'm a little worried about some of the removals/movings of node_set_online() in the patch. diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c index 1666e7d..dcedc26 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c @@ -49,7 +49,6 @@ static int __cpuinit fake_numa_create_new_node(unsigned long end_pfn, static unsigned int fake_nid = 0; static unsigned long long curr_boundary = 0; - *nid = fake_nid; if (!p) return 0; @@ -60,6 +59,7 @@ static int __cpuinit fake_numa_create_new_node(unsigned long end_pfn, if (mem < curr_boundary) return 0; + *nid = fake_nid; curr_boundary = mem; if ((end_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) > mem) {
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev