On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:00:12 +0100 Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 11:31:46AM -0600, Jon Loeliger wrote: > > Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > >>What impact do the have on boards in arch/ppc being able to build? > > > > > >Byt the way what are the plans for powerpc? > > >We have: > > >arch/ppc > > >arch/ppc64 > > >arch/powerpc > > > > > >It was my understanding that arch/powerpc was supposed > > >to be the future unified powerpc architecture but it > > >does not even provide a defconfig. > > > > > >And I do not see too much happening to do so - but that maybe > > >because I looked at a wrong place. > > > > You must have looked in the wrong place. :-) > > > > arch/ppc is scheduled for removal from mainline in June. > Good to hear. > > > arch/powerpc is under significant development, with lots > > of defconfigs in arch/powerpc/configs. > Double checked - it was my build script that used ARCH=ppc > Now I just need to build another toolchain as the ppc750 could not build > the defconfig. crosstool is my friend here. You'll need mkimage if you ever venture into some of the embedded board configs. Just an FYI. josh _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev