See below. On 11/22/2017 05:17 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Nathan Fontenot <nf...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes: >> On 11/16/2017 11:24 AM, Michael Bringmann wrote: > ... >>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c >>> index eb604b3..334a1ff 100644 >>> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c >>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c >>> @@ -892,6 +892,37 @@ static void __init setup_node_data(int nid, u64 >>> start_pfn, u64 end_pfn) >>> NODE_DATA(nid)->node_spanned_pages = spanned_pages; >>> } >>> >>> +static void __init find_possible_nodes(void) >>> +{ >>> + struct device_node *rtas; >>> + u32 numnodes, i; >>> + >>> + if (min_common_depth <= 0) >>> + return; >>> + >>> + rtas = of_find_node_by_path("/rtas"); >>> + if (!rtas) >>> + return; >>> + >>> + if (of_property_read_u32_index(rtas, >>> + "ibm,max-associativity-domains", >>> + min_common_depth, &numnodes)) >>> + goto out; >>> + >>> + pr_info("numa: Nodes = %d (mcd = %d)\n", numnodes, >>> + min_common_depth); >> >> numa.c already has a pr_fmt define, no need to pre-pend "numa:" to the >> information message. > > And in fact no need to print that out here at all, it's covered > elsewhere. So just drop that pr_info() entirely. > > cheers > >
Okay. pr_info() removed. -- Michael W. Bringmann Linux Technology Center IBM Corporation Tie-Line 363-5196 External: (512) 286-5196 Cell: (512) 466-0650 m...@linux.vnet.ibm.com