On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:14:39 -0300 Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mauri...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi Michael, > > On 03/13/2018 08:39 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > >> I agree; the 'Using fallback displacement flush' message is > >> misleading (is the system slower/fallback or not? Ô_o) > > > That message is actually just wrong. > > > > It still prints that even if enable=false. > > > > So we should change all those messages, perhaps: > > > > pr_info("rfi-flush: fallback displacement flush > > available\n"); pr_info("rfi-flush: ori type flush available\n"); > > pr_info("rfi-flush: mttrig type flush available\n"); > > Indeed. Maybe it would make more sense to move the messages to the function that actually patches in the instructions? Thanks Michal