Using an si_code of 0 that aliases with SI_USER is clearly the
wrong thing todo, and causes problems in interesting ways.

The newly defined FPE_FLTUNK semantically appears to fit the
bill so use it instead.

Cc: Paul Mackerras <pau...@samba.org>
Cc: Kumar Gala <kumar.g...@freescale.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc:  linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Fixes: 9bad068c24d7 ("[PATCH] ppc32: support for e500 and 85xx")
Fixes: 0ed70f6105ef ("PPC32: Provide proper siginfo information on various 
exceptions.")
History Tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebied...@xmission.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h | 7 -------
 arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c             | 6 +++---
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h 
b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h
index 9f142451a01f..0437afc9ef3c 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h
@@ -15,13 +15,6 @@
 
 #include <asm-generic/siginfo.h>
 
-/*
- * SIGFPE si_codes
- */
-#ifdef __KERNEL__
-#define FPE_FIXME      0       /* Broken dup of SI_USER */
-#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
-
 /*
  * SIGTRAP si_codes
  */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
index 087855caf6a9..fdf9400beec8 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
@@ -1031,7 +1031,7 @@ static void emulate_single_step(struct pt_regs *regs)
 
 static inline int __parse_fpscr(unsigned long fpscr)
 {
-       int ret = FPE_FIXME;
+       int ret = FPE_FLTUNK;
 
        /* Invalid operation */
        if ((fpscr & FPSCR_VE) && (fpscr & FPSCR_VX))
@@ -1972,7 +1972,7 @@ void SPEFloatingPointException(struct pt_regs *regs)
        extern int do_spe_mathemu(struct pt_regs *regs);
        unsigned long spefscr;
        int fpexc_mode;
-       int code = FPE_FIXME;
+       int code = FPE_FLTUNK;
        int err;
 
        flush_spe_to_thread(current);
@@ -2041,7 +2041,7 @@ void SPEFloatingPointRoundException(struct pt_regs *regs)
                printk(KERN_ERR "unrecognized spe instruction "
                       "in %s at %lx\n", current->comm, regs->nip);
        } else {
-               _exception(SIGFPE, regs, FPE_FIXME, regs->nip);
+               _exception(SIGFPE, regs, FPE_FLTUNK, regs->nip);
                return;
        }
 }
-- 
2.14.1

Reply via email to