On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 5:04 PM Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de> wrote:
>
> There is no good reason to duplicate the PCI menu in every architecture.
> Instead provide a selectable HAS_PCI symbol that indicates availability
HAS_PCI -> HAVE_PCI
> of PCI support and the handle the rest in drivers/pci.
>
> Note that for powerpc we now select HAVE_PCI globally instead of the
> convoluted mess of conditional or or non-conditional support per board,
> similar to what we do e.g. on x86. For alpha PCI is selected for the
> non-jensen configs as it was the default before, and a lot of code does
> not compile without PCI enabled. On other architectures with limited
> PCI support that wasn't as complicated I've left the selection as-is.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelg...@google.com>
Just in case, could you double-check these?
PCI_ENDPOINT
PCI_ENDPOINT_CONFIGFS
PCI_EPF_TEST
Previously, architecture without "source drivers/pci/Kconfig"
could not enable PCI_ENDPOINT.
Now, any architecture can enable it
regardless of its actual PCI availability
because PCI_ENDPOINT is only guarded by HAS_DMA.
We could add 'depends on HAVE_PCI' or something
to guard it to avoid changing the logic.
config PCI_ENDPOINT
bool "PCI Endpoint Support"
depends on HAVE_PCI # Is this correct ??
depends on HAS_DMA
or better to have 'depends on PCI' ?
PCI ML is also CC'ed, so comments are appreciated.
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
