Hi,

On 31/10/18 8:03 AM, Xiaowei Bao wrote:
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Xiaowei Bao 
> Sent: 2018年10月26日 17:19
> To: 'Kishon Vijay Abraham I' <kis...@ti.com>; bhelg...@google.com; 
> robh...@kernel.org; mark.rutl...@arm.com; shawn...@kernel.org; Leo Li 
> <leoyang...@nxp.com>; lorenzo.pieral...@arm.com; a...@arndb.de; 
> gre...@linuxfoundation.org; M.h. Lian <minghuan.l...@nxp.com>; Mingkai Hu 
> <mingkai...@nxp.com>; Roy Zang <roy.z...@nxp.com>; 
> kstew...@linuxfoundation.org; cyrille.pitc...@free-electrons.com; 
> pombreda...@nexb.com; shawn....@rock-chips.com; niklas.cas...@axis.com; 
> linux-...@vger.kernel.org; devicet...@vger.kernel.org; 
> linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; 
> linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> Cc: Jiafei Pan <jiafei....@nxp.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 5/6] pci: layerscape: Add the EP mode support.
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kis...@ti.com>
> Sent: 2018年10月26日 13:29
> To: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei....@nxp.com>; bhelg...@google.com; 
> robh...@kernel.org; mark.rutl...@arm.com; shawn...@kernel.org; Leo Li 
> <leoyang...@nxp.com>; lorenzo.pieral...@arm.com; a...@arndb.de; 
> gre...@linuxfoundation.org; M.h. Lian <minghuan.l...@nxp.com>; Mingkai Hu 
> <mingkai...@nxp.com>; Roy Zang <roy.z...@nxp.com>; 
> kstew...@linuxfoundation.org; cyrille.pitc...@free-electrons.com; 
> pombreda...@nexb.com; shawn....@rock-chips.com; niklas.cas...@axis.com; 
> linux-...@vger.kernel.org; devicet...@vger.kernel.org; 
> linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; 
> linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] pci: layerscape: Add the EP mode support.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Thursday 25 October 2018 04:39 PM, Xiaowei Bao wrote:
>> Add the PCIe EP mode support for layerscape platform.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei....@nxp.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile            |    2 +-
>>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c |  161
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 162 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)  create mode
>> 100644 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile
>> b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile
>> index 5d2ce72..b26d617 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile
>> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_EXYNOS) += pci-exynos.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_IMX6) += pci-imx6.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_SPEAR13XX) += pcie-spear13xx.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_KEYSTONE) += pci-keystone-dw.o pci-keystone.o
>> -obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_LAYERSCAPE) += pci-layerscape.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_LAYERSCAPE) += pci-layerscape.o pci-layerscape-ep.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_QCOM) += pcie-qcom.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_ARMADA_8K) += pcie-armada8k.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_ARTPEC6) += pcie-artpec6.o diff --git 
>> a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
>> b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..3b33bbc
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,161 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +/*
>> + * PCIe controller EP driver for Freescale Layerscape SoCs
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2018 NXP Semiconductor.
>> + *
>> + * Author: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei....@nxp.com>  */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <linux/init.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_pci.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
>> +#include <linux/pci.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/resource.h>
>> +
>> +#include "pcie-designware.h"
>> +
>> +#define PCIE_DBI2_OFFSET            0x1000  /* DBI2 base address*/
> 
> The base address should come from dt.
>> +
>> +struct ls_pcie_ep {
>> +    struct dw_pcie          *pci;
>> +};
>> +
>> +#define to_ls_pcie_ep(x)    dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
>> +
>> +static bool ls_pcie_is_bridge(struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie) {
>> +    struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci;
>> +    u32 header_type;
>> +
>> +    header_type = ioread8(pci->dbi_base + PCI_HEADER_TYPE);
>> +    header_type &= 0x7f;
>> +
>> +    return header_type == PCI_HEADER_TYPE_BRIDGE; }
>> +
>> +static int ls_pcie_establish_link(struct dw_pcie *pci) {
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
> 
> There should be some way by which EP should tell RC that it is not configured 
> yet. Are there no bits to control LTSSM state initialization or Configuration 
> retry status enabling?
> [Xiaowei Bao] There have not bits to control LTSSM state to tell the RC it is 
> configured. The start link is auto completed.
> [Xiaowei Bao] Hi Kishon, is there any advice?

If there is no HW support, I don't think anything could be done here. This
could result in RC reading configuration space even before EP is fully 
initialized.
>> +
>> +static const struct dw_pcie_ops ls_pcie_ep_ops = {
>> +    .start_link = ls_pcie_establish_link, };
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id ls_pcie_ep_of_match[] = {
>> +    { .compatible = "fsl,ls-pcie-ep",},
>> +    { },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void ls_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep) {
>> +    struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
>> +    struct pci_epc *epc = ep->epc;
>> +    enum pci_barno bar;
>> +
>> +    for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar++)
>> +            dw_pcie_ep_reset_bar(pci, bar);
>> +
>> +    epc->features |= EPC_FEATURE_NO_LINKUP_NOTIFIER; }
>> +
>> +static int ls_pcie_ep_raise_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no,
>> +                              enum pci_epc_irq_type type, u16 
>> interrupt_num) {
>> +    struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
>> +
>> +    switch (type) {
>> +    case PCI_EPC_IRQ_LEGACY:
>> +            return dw_pcie_ep_raise_legacy_irq(ep, func_no);
>> +    case PCI_EPC_IRQ_MSI:
>> +            return dw_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq(ep, func_no, interrupt_num);
>> +    case PCI_EPC_IRQ_MSIX:
>> +            return dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq(ep, func_no, interrupt_num);
>> +    default:
>> +            dev_err(pci->dev, "UNKNOWN IRQ type\n");
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct dw_pcie_ep_ops pcie_ep_ops = {
>> +    .ep_init = ls_pcie_ep_init,
>> +    .raise_irq = ls_pcie_ep_raise_irq,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int __init ls_add_pcie_ep(struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie,
>> +                                    struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> +    struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci;
>> +    struct device *dev = pci->dev;
>> +    struct dw_pcie_ep *ep;
>> +    struct resource *res;
>> +    int ret;
>> +
>> +    ep = &pci->ep;
>> +    ep->ops = &pcie_ep_ops;
>> +
>> +    res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "addr_space");
>> +    if (!res)
>> +            return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +    ep->phys_base = res->start;
>> +    ep->addr_size = resource_size(res);
>> +
>> +    ret = dw_pcie_ep_init(ep);
>> +    if (ret) {
>> +            dev_err(dev, "failed to initialize endpoint\n");
>> +            return ret;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) {
>> +    struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> +    struct dw_pcie *pci;
>> +    struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie;
>> +    struct resource *dbi_base;
>> +    int ret;
>> +
>> +    pcie = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pcie), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +    if (!pcie)
>> +            return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +    pci = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pci), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +    if (!pci)
>> +            return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +    dbi_base = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "regs");
>> +    pci->dbi_base = devm_pci_remap_cfg_resource(dev, dbi_base);
>> +    if (IS_ERR(pci->dbi_base))
>> +            return PTR_ERR(pci->dbi_base);
>> +
>> +    pci->dbi_base2 = pci->dbi_base + PCIE_DBI2_OFFSET;
>> +    pci->dev = dev;
>> +    pci->ops = &ls_pcie_ep_ops;
>> +    pcie->pci = pci;
>> +
>> +    if (ls_pcie_is_bridge(pcie))
>> +            return -ENODEV;
> 
> For an endpoint this condition should never occur. This should only mean, a 
> wrong compatible has been used in dt.
> [Xiaowei Bao] This function is a way that can check the PCI controller 
> whether work in EP mode, I think it is more safer. Of course, it can be 
> removed.
> [Xiaowei Bao] Hi Kishon, is there any advice?

IMHO this check is not required.

Thanks
Kishon

Reply via email to