Prevailing practice for define_machine() in powerpc is to use the
platform name when the platform has only one define_machine()
statement, but maple uses "maple_md". This caused me some
head-scratching when writing some new code that uses
machine_is(maple).
Use "maple" instead of "maple_md". There should not be any behavioral
change -- fixup_maple_ide() calls machine_is(maple) but the body of
the function is ifdef'd out.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/maple/setup.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/maple/setup.c
b/arch/powerpc/platforms/maple/setup.c
index 3ce2d73..3b32e07 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/maple/setup.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/maple/setup.c
@@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ static int __init maple_probe(void)
return 1;
}
-define_machine(maple_md) {
+define_machine(maple) {
.name = "Maple",
.probe = maple_probe,
.setup_arch = maple_setup_arch,
--
1.5.4.4
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
