On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 8:57 PM Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au> wrote: > > Oliver O'Halloran <ooh...@gmail.com> writes: > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h > > b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h > > index aee4fcc24990..149053b7f481 100644 > > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h > > @@ -274,6 +274,8 @@ extern int pcibios_map_io_space(struct pci_bus *bus); > > extern struct pci_controller *pci_find_hose_for_OF_device( > > struct device_node* node); > > > > +extern struct pci_controller *pci_find_hose_for_domain(uint32_t domain_nr); > > I know we use "hose" a lot in the PCI code, but it's a stupid name. Can > we not introduce new usages?
I was tempted to call it pci_find_horse_for_domain(), but neigh. > > It returns a pci_controller so pci_find_controller_for_domain()? ok > > cheers