[PATCH 08/41] drivers: tty: serial: sb1250-duart: fix checkpatch warning on printk()

[Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult]

checkpatch complaints:

    WARNING: printk() should include KERN_<LEVEL> facility level
    #698: FILE: drivers/tty/serial/sb1250-duart.c:698:
    +           printk(err);

    WARNING: printk() should include KERN_<LEVEL> facility level
    #706: FILE: drivers/tty/serial/sb1250-duart.c:706:
    +                   printk(err);

Even though it's a false alarm here (the string is already prefixed
w/ KERN_ERR), it's nicer to use pr_err() here, which also makes
checkpatch happy.

Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt <i...@metux.net>
---
 drivers/tty/serial/sb1250-duart.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/sb1250-duart.c 
b/drivers/tty/serial/sb1250-duart.c
index b4342c8..227af87 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/sb1250-duart.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/sb1250-duart.c
@@ -689,13 +689,13 @@ static int sbd_map_port(struct uart_port *uport)
 
 static int sbd_request_port(struct uart_port *uport)
 {
-       const char *err = KERN_ERR "sbd: Unable to reserve MMIO resource\n";
+       const char *err = "sbd: Unable to reserve MMIO resource\n";
        struct sbd_duart *duart = to_sport(uport)->duart;
        int ret = 0;
 
        if (!request_mem_region(uport->mapbase, DUART_CHANREG_SPACING,
                                "sb1250-duart")) {
-               printk(err);
+               pr_err(err);
                return -EBUSY;
        }
        refcount_inc(&duart->map_guard);
@@ -703,7 +703,7 @@ static int sbd_request_port(struct uart_port *uport)
                if (!request_mem_region(duart->mapctrl, DUART_CHANREG_SPACING,
                                        "sb1250-duart")) {
                        refcount_dec(&duart->map_guard);
-                       printk(err);
+                       pr_err(err);
                        ret = -EBUSY;
                }
        }
-- 
1.9.1