Hi Jon, Thanks for quick response!
在 2019/7/13 上午1:34, Jonathan Corbet 写道: > On Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:20:07 +0800 > Alex Shi <alex....@linux.alibaba.com> wrote: > >> There are many different archs in Documentation/ dir, it's better to >> move them together in 'Documentation/arch' which follows from kernel source. > > So this seems certain to collide badly with Mauro's RST-conversion monster > patch set. I don't mean that, sorry, and we can figure out if both of them are worthy to be picked up. > > More to the point, though...if we are going to thrash up things this > badly, we want to be sure that we're doing it right so we don't end up > renaming everything again. Grouping stuff into a new arch/ subdirectory > adds a bit of order, but it doesn't do much toward trying to organize our > documentation for its readers, and it doesn't help us to modernize the > docs and get rid of the old, useless stuff. A quick check shows that many > of these files have seen no changes other than typo fixes since the > beginning of the Git era. Right, there is some docs which need to be update or even drop, and a reorder would be a timing to push each of arch maintainer to do something, isn't it? Anyway, reordering documents like kernel source dir could be one of choices. :) > > So, in my mind, this needs some thought. Maybe we want a > Documentation/arch in the end, but I'm not convinced that we should just > create it and fill it with a snow shovel. This might be a good thing to > discuss at the kernel summit in September. Thanks for considering, anyway, it could be a good start to get hands dirty whether the arch dir is needed. Thanks Alex
