Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>>> + [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
>>> + label = "fs";
>>> + reg = <0x00300000 0x07c00000>;
>>> + };
>>> + [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
>>> + label = "firmware";
>>> + reg = <0x07700000 0x00100000>;
>> These two overlap; should the latter be @7f00000?
>
> Yes, of course.
>
>>> + [EMAIL PROTECTED],0 {
>>> + device_type = "can";
>> No device_type please.
>
> OK, but then I better use a more descriptive name for the compatible
> property, e.g.:
>
> compatible = "can-i82527"; // Intel 82527 or Bosch CC770
>
>>> + [EMAIL PROTECTED],0 {
>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>> + #size-cells = <1>;
>>> + compatible = "fsl,mpc8560-fcm-nand",
>>> + "fsl,elbc-fcm-nand";
>>> + reg = <0x3 0x0 0x8000>;
>>> +
>>> + [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
>>> + label = "kernel";
>>> + reg = <0x000000 0x0300000>;
>>> + };
>>> + [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
>>> + label = "fs";
>>> + reg = <0x300000 0x7d00000>;
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> + };
>> There should be a node that describes the nand chip between the nand
>> controller node and the partition nodes.
>
> I took the mpc8378_*.dts files of 2.6.25-rc8 as example and there is no
> such node. Could you point me please to a more appropriate example.
In the meantime I realized, that the upcoming FSL UPM driver seems to be
appropriate for that board:
http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2008-March/052890.html
What is the status of this driver? Are there already some boards using
it (including DTS file)?
Wolfgang.
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev