On 9/18/19 5:01 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n....@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
Michael Ellerman wrote:
"Gautham R. Shenoy" <e...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <e...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
....
Also, since we expose [S]PURR through sysfs, any tools that make use of
that directly are also affected due to this.
But again if we've had the current behaviour for 10 years then arguably
that's now the correct behaviour.
Or nobody is looking at PURR based accounting/usage metric on Linux. We
got some customers complaining about this recently once they started
using the metric.
-aneesh
