> On 19-Mar-2020, at 6:53 PM, Vlastimil Babka <vba...@suse.cz> wrote:
> 
> On 3/19/20 9:52 AM, Sachin Sant wrote:
>> 
>>> OK how about this version? It's somewhat ugly, but important is that the 
>>> fast
>>> path case (c->page exists) is unaffected and another common case (c->page is
>>> NULL, but node is NUMA_NO_NODE) is just one extra check - impossible to 
>>> avoid at
>>> some point anyway.
>>> 
>> 
>> I attempted the suggested tests.
>> 
>> Test 1: March 18 linux-next + Patch 1 [1] + Patch  2 [2]
>> 
>> Machine boots fine. numactl o/p after boot:
> 
> Great, thanks! Can I add your Tested-by: then?

Sure.
Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sach...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Thank you for the fix.

Thanks
-Sachin

Reply via email to