Kumar Gala writes: > > Wouldn't it be better and safer to have the exception prolog for > > critical interrupts save SRR0/1 in the stack frame, and have the > > prolog for machine checks save SRR0/1 and CSRR0/1 likewise? > > If we do this I guess we can use SRR0/1 regardless of which level we > came from.
That's the idea. I actually thought the booke exception prologs already did that, but it seems I'm wrong. What sort of things do you expect critical and machine-check handlers to be needing to do? Paul. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
