Andrew Morton writes: > > Odd. I thought Paul had picked up a docbook RapidIO patch from you in > > the latest merge round. > > > > Well it's more than "a" patch. The six-week-old patch series is: > > rapidio-add-memory-mapping-driver-to-rapidio.patch > rapidio-add-rapidio-space-allocation-bitmap-arithmetic.patch > rapidio-add-fsl-rapidio-controller-memory-ops-functions.patch > rapidio-add-the-rapidio-master-port-maintance-and-doorbell-window-to-space-resources.patch > rapidio-add-rapidio-proc-fs-for-memory-mapping-debugging.patch > rapidio-add-the-memory-mapping-support-in-rionet-driver.patch > rapidio-fix-docbook-references.patch > rapidio-fix-kernel-doc-problems.patch
What happened is that you (Andrew) sent them on to me pretty much unexamined. I took a look at them and dropped one of them because it created a new /proc file. I asked Kumar to look at them and he had issues with another three of the patches, and dropping those meant that all the following ones (including the fix-kernel-doc one) wouldn't apply, so I dropped them too. I applied the rest and sent them to Linus. > (seems that I forgot to cc Jeff on the rionet change too). Yeah. I nearly dropped that one too. I probably should have. :) > Oh well. If nobody puts their hand up in the next 24 hours or so I'll just > send it all in to Linus. Please don't. At this stage I think the best thing is for Kumar to talk to Zhang Wei (they both work for Freescale, so that should be possible in theory :) and get him to rework the remaining patches as required for inclusion in 2.6.27. Paul. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
