The tpm2_get_cc_attrs_tbl() call will result in TPM commands being issued,
which will need the use of the internal command/response buffer.  But,
we're issuing this *before* we've waited to make sure that buffer is
allocated.

This can result in intermittent failures to probe if the hypervisor / TPM
implementation doesn't respond quickly enough.  I find it fails almost
every time with an 8 vcpu guest under KVM with software emulated TPM.

To fix it, just move the tpm2_get_cc_attrs_tlb() call after the
existing code to wait for initialization, which will ensure the buffer
is allocated.

Fixes: 18b3670d79ae9 ("tpm: ibmvtpm: Add support for TPM2")
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
---

Changes from v1:
 * Fixed a formatting error in the commit message
 * Added some more detail to the commit message
 
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
index 09fe45246b8cc..994385bf37c0c 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
@@ -683,13 +683,6 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_probe(struct vio_dev *vio_dev,
        if (rc)
                goto init_irq_cleanup;
 
-       if (!strcmp(id->compat, "IBM,vtpm20")) {
-               chip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2;
-               rc = tpm2_get_cc_attrs_tbl(chip);
-               if (rc)
-                       goto init_irq_cleanup;
-       }
-
        if (!wait_event_timeout(ibmvtpm->crq_queue.wq,
                                ibmvtpm->rtce_buf != NULL,
                                HZ)) {
@@ -697,6 +690,13 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_probe(struct vio_dev *vio_dev,
                goto init_irq_cleanup;
        }
 
+       if (!strcmp(id->compat, "IBM,vtpm20")) {
+               chip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2;
+               rc = tpm2_get_cc_attrs_tbl(chip);
+               if (rc)
+                       goto init_irq_cleanup;
+       }
+
        return tpm_chip_register(chip);
 init_irq_cleanup:
        do {
-- 
2.26.2

Reply via email to