On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Stephen Neuendorffer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The IBM coreconnect names are pretty well defined, it appears.  In
>  addition, the Xilinx versions of these IPs seem to be proliferating.
>  Hence, in the future let's prefer to use the standard names.  I've
>  left the old names in for some backward compatibility for existing
>  device trees.
>
>  Signed-off-by: Stephen Neuendorffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Acked-by: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I think we can probably give it a release or two and then drop the
older stuff in the list.  Virtex support is still very new, so it is
unlikely that there are many (any?) users out there that won't be
keeping up to date with the xilinx device tree changes.

Cheers,
g.

>  ---
>   arch/powerpc/platforms/40x/virtex.c |    4 ++++
>   1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
>  diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/40x/virtex.c 
> b/arch/powerpc/platforms/40x/virtex.c
>  index 6c72994..7e1c0e3 100644
>  --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/40x/virtex.c
>  +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/40x/virtex.c
>  @@ -16,11 +16,15 @@
>   #include <asm/xilinx_intc.h>
>
>   static struct of_device_id xilinx_of_bus_ids[] __initdata = {
>  +       { .compatible = "ibm,plb3", },
>  +       { .compatible = "ibm,plb4", },
>         { .compatible = "xlnx,plb-v46-1.00.a", },
>         { .compatible = "xlnx,plb-v46-1.02.a", },
>         { .compatible = "xlnx,plb-v34-1.01.a", },
>         { .compatible = "xlnx,plb-v34-1.02.a", },
>  +       { .compatible = "ibm,opb", },
>         { .compatible = "xlnx,opb-v20-1.10.c", },
>  +       { .compatible = "ibm,dcr", },
>         { .compatible = "xlnx,dcr-v29-1.00.a", },
>         { .compatible = "xlnx,compound", },
>         {}
>  --
>  1.5.3.4
>
>
>
>



-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to