On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 07:57:49PM +0200, Gerald Schaefer wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:02:33 -0300
> Jason Gunthorpe <j...@ziepe.ca> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 11:39:25AM +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> >
> > > As Gerald mentioned, it is very difficult to explain in a clear way.
> > > Hopefully, one could make sense ot of it.
> >
> > I would say the page table API requires this invariant:
> >
> > pud = pud_offset(p4d, addr);
> > do {
> > WARN_ON(pud != pud_offset(p4d, addr);
> > next = pud_addr_end(addr, end);
> > } while (pud++, addr = next, addr != end);
> >
> > ie pud++ is supposed to be a shortcut for
> > pud_offset(p4d, next)
> >
>
> Hmm, IIUC, all architectures with static folding will simply return
> the passed-in p4d pointer for pud_offset(p4d, addr), for 3-level
> pagetables.
It is probably moot now, but since other arch's don't crash they also
return pud_addr_end() == end so the loop only does one iteration.
ie pud == pud_offset(p4d, addr) for all iterations as the pud++ never
happens.
Which is what this addr_end patch does for s390..
Jason
