On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 13:40 -0700, Trent Piepho wrote: > There was some discussion on a Freescale list if the powerpc I/O accessors > should be strictly ordered w.r.t. normal memory. Currently they are not. It > does not appear as if any other architecture's I/O accessors are strictly > ordered in this manner. memory-barriers.txt explicitly states that the I/O > space (inb, outw, etc.) are NOT strictly ordered w.r.t. normal memory > accesses and it's implied the other I/O accessors (e.g., writel) are the same. > > However, it is somewhat harder to program for this model, and there are almost > certainly a number of drivers using coherent DMA which have subtle bugs > because > the do not include the necessary barriers. > > But clearly and change to this would be a subject for a different patch.
The current accessors should provide all the necessary ordering guarantees... Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev