On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 11:02 AM Christophe Leroy
<christophe.le...@csgroup.eu> wrote:
>
>
>
> Le 02/09/2020 à 19:41, Nick Desaulniers a écrit :
> > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 5:14 AM Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
> >>
> >> Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulni...@google.com> writes:
> >>> Fixes: commit f2af201002a8 ("powerpc/build: vdso linker warning for
> >>> orphan sections")
> >>
> >> I think I'll just revert that for v5.9 ?
> >
> > SGTM; you'll probably still want these changes with some modifications
> > at some point; vdso32 did have at least one orphaned section, and will
> > be important for hermetic builds. Seeing crashes in supported
> > versions of the tools ties our hands at the moment.
> >
>
> Keeping the tool problem aside with binutils 2.26, do you have a way to
> really link an elf32ppc object when building vdso32 for PPC64 ?
Sorry, I'm doing a bug scrub and found
https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/774 still open (and my
reply to this thread still in Drafts; never sent). With my patches
rebased:
$ file arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/vdso32.so
arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/vdso32.so: ELF 32-bit MSB shared object,
PowerPC or cisco 4500, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, stripped
Are you still using 2.26?
I'm not able to repro Nathan's reported issue from
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200902052123.GA2687902@ubuntu-n2-xlarge-x86/,
so I'm curious if I should resend the rebased patches as v2?
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
