On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 11:40:37AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Grant Likely wrote:
>
> > 2) for i2c purposes, explicit enumeration is not needed or desired.
> > All the necessary data is already present in the device tree in that
> > i2c device nodes are children of i2c bus nodes. The i2c bus numbers
> > should be dynamically assigned.
>
> NACK. For ASoC driver, they cannot be dynamically assigned. I2C1 must be
> labeled as such.
So use aliases, this is exactly what they're for. How many times do
Grant and I have to say it?
A fallback to cell-index and/or index is acceptable, for easier
compatibility with existing trees, but aliases must be the primary
method for assigning system-wide numbers.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
