On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 21:55:11 -0700 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Might be a platform thing, might be an ATA thing:

OK, I found Hugh's fix.

Please let's not release 2.6.27 with a 1000-patch bisect-breaking hole
in it.

From: Hugh Dickins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Fix G5 SATA irq 18: nobody cared, reported on -rc5 by Olaf Hering: fixlet
to a57c1bade5a0ee5cd8b74502db9cbebb7f5780b2 libata-sff: Fix oops reported
in kerneloops.org for pnp devices with no ctl

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Tested-by: Olaf Hering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---

 drivers/ata/libata-sff.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff -puN drivers/ata/libata-sff.c~libata-fix-g5-sata-broken-on-rc5 
drivers/ata/libata-sff.c
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c~libata-fix-g5-sata-broken-on-rc5
+++ a/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ static u8 ata_sff_irq_status(struct ata_
                        return status;
        }
        /* Clear INTRQ latch */
-       status = ata_sff_check_status(ap);
+       status = ap->ops->sff_check_status(ap);
        return status;
 }
 
_

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to