In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > On Wednesday 11 June 2008, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 18:28 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > We used to do this correctly in case of a user triggered > > > kexec, but not for kdump. > > > > Used to? > > Sorry, wrong wording. I meant without this patch, it's correct > for kexec. > > > > This patch disables ptcal from the cell specific > > > machine_crash_shutdown() callback. > > > > I'd rather you used the crash_shutdown_register() infrastructure Mikey > > added for EHEA - it's designed for just this sort of thing. > > Thanks for pointing this out, I wasn't aware of that call. > New patch coming up.
In theory we can register lots of call backs but currently the maximum is set to 1 through CRASH_HANDLER_MAX. This is to discourage people from using this infrastructure at all. Unless there's some crazy arse company that's going to mix a CBE with an eHEA, we are probably ok leaving this at 1. Right? Mikey _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
