Reduce maintenance burden of DVSEC query implementation by using the centralized PCI core implementation.
There are two obvious places to simply drop in the new core implementation. There remains find_dvsec_from_pos() which would benefit from using a core implementation. As that change is less trivial it is reserved for later. Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: Andrew Donnellan <a...@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Frederic Barrat <fbar...@linux.ibm.com> (v1) Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widaw...@intel.com> --- arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/ocxl.c | 3 ++- drivers/misc/ocxl/config.c | 13 +------------ 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/ocxl.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/ocxl.c index 9105efcf242a..28b009b46464 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/ocxl.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/ocxl.c @@ -107,7 +107,8 @@ static int get_max_afu_index(struct pci_dev *dev, int *afu_idx) int pos; u32 val; - pos = find_dvsec_from_pos(dev, OCXL_DVSEC_FUNC_ID, 0); + pos = pci_find_dvsec_capability(dev, PCI_VENDOR_ID_IBM, + OCXL_DVSEC_FUNC_ID); if (!pos) return -ESRCH; diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/config.c b/drivers/misc/ocxl/config.c index a68738f38252..e401a51596b9 100644 --- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/config.c +++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/config.c @@ -33,18 +33,7 @@ static int find_dvsec(struct pci_dev *dev, int dvsec_id) { - int vsec = 0; - u16 vendor, id; - - while ((vsec = pci_find_next_ext_capability(dev, vsec, - OCXL_EXT_CAP_ID_DVSEC))) { - pci_read_config_word(dev, vsec + OCXL_DVSEC_VENDOR_OFFSET, - &vendor); - pci_read_config_word(dev, vsec + OCXL_DVSEC_ID_OFFSET, &id); - if (vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_IBM && id == dvsec_id) - return vsec; - } - return 0; + return pci_find_dvsec_capability(dev, PCI_VENDOR_ID_IBM, dvsec_id); } static int find_dvsec_afu_ctrl(struct pci_dev *dev, u8 afu_idx) -- 2.33.0