Rob Herring <r...@kernel.org> writes:
> Replace open coded parsing of CPU nodes' 'reg' property with
> of_get_cpu_hwid().
>
> Cc: Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au>
> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <pau...@samba.org>
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <r...@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 7 +------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> index 9cc7d3dbf439..d96b0e361a73 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -1313,18 +1313,13 @@ int __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct 
> *tidle)
>  int cpu_to_core_id(int cpu)
>  {
>       struct device_node *np;
> -     const __be32 *reg;
>       int id = -1;
>  
>       np = of_get_cpu_node(cpu, NULL);
>       if (!np)
>               goto out;
>  
> -     reg = of_get_property(np, "reg", NULL);
> -     if (!reg)
> -             goto out;
> -
> -     id = be32_to_cpup(reg);
> +     id = of_get_cpu_hwid(np, 0);
>  out:
>       of_node_put(np);
>       return id;

This looks OK to me.

All the systems I can find have a /cpus/#address-cells of 1, so the
change to use of_n_addr_cells() in of_get_cpu_hwid() should be fine.

I booted it on a bunch of systems with no issues.

Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au>

cheers

Reply via email to