Le 11/12/2021 à 04:33, Tiezhu Yang a écrit :
> In arch/*/kernel/crash_dump*.c, there exist many similar code
> about copy_oldmem_page(), remove copy_to() in fs/proc/vmcore.c
> and add copy_to_user_or_kernel() in lib/usercopy.c, then we can
> use copy_to_user_or_kernel() to simplify the related code.

It should be an inline function in uaccess.h, see below why.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtie...@loongson.cn>
> ---
>   fs/proc/vmcore.c        | 28 +++++++---------------------
>   include/linux/uaccess.h |  1 +
>   lib/usercopy.c          | 15 +++++++++++++++
>   3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/proc/vmcore.c b/fs/proc/vmcore.c
> index 509f851..f67fd77 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/vmcore.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/vmcore.c
> @@ -238,22 +238,8 @@ copy_oldmem_page_encrypted(unsigned long pfn, char *buf, 
> size_t csize,
>       return copy_oldmem_page(pfn, buf, csize, offset, userbuf);
>   }
>   
> -/*
> - * Copy to either kernel or user space
> - */
> -static int copy_to(void *target, void *src, size_t size, int userbuf)
> -{
> -     if (userbuf) {
> -             if (copy_to_user((char __user *) target, src, size))
> -                     return -EFAULT;
> -     } else {
> -             memcpy(target, src, size);
> -     }
> -     return 0;
> -}
> -
>   #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_VMCORE_DEVICE_DUMP
> -static int vmcoredd_copy_dumps(void *dst, u64 start, size_t size, int 
> userbuf)
> +static int vmcoredd_copy_dumps(void *dst, u64 start, size_t size, bool 
> userbuf)

Changing int to bool in all the callers should be another patch. You can 
have copy_to_user_or_kernel() take a bool in the patch while still 
having all the callers using an int.

>   {
>       struct vmcoredd_node *dump;
>       u64 offset = 0;
> @@ -266,7 +252,7 @@ static int vmcoredd_copy_dumps(void *dst, u64 start, 
> size_t size, int userbuf)
>               if (start < offset + dump->size) {
>                       tsz = min(offset + (u64)dump->size - start, (u64)size);
>                       buf = dump->buf + start - offset;
> -                     if (copy_to(dst, buf, tsz, userbuf)) {
> +                     if (copy_to_user_or_kernel(dst, buf, tsz, userbuf)) {
>                               ret = -EFAULT;
>                               goto out_unlock;
>                       }
> @@ -330,7 +316,7 @@ static int vmcoredd_mmap_dumps(struct vm_area_struct 
> *vma, unsigned long dst,
>    * returned otherwise number of bytes read are returned.
>    */
>   static ssize_t __read_vmcore(char *buffer, size_t buflen, loff_t *fpos,
> -                          int userbuf)
> +                          bool userbuf)
>   {
>       ssize_t acc = 0, tmp;
>       size_t tsz;
> @@ -347,7 +333,7 @@ static ssize_t __read_vmcore(char *buffer, size_t buflen, 
> loff_t *fpos,
>       /* Read ELF core header */
>       if (*fpos < elfcorebuf_sz) {
>               tsz = min(elfcorebuf_sz - (size_t)*fpos, buflen);
> -             if (copy_to(buffer, elfcorebuf + *fpos, tsz, userbuf))
> +             if (copy_to_user_or_kernel(buffer, elfcorebuf + *fpos, tsz, 
> userbuf))
>                       return -EFAULT;
>               buflen -= tsz;
>               *fpos += tsz;
> @@ -395,7 +381,7 @@ static ssize_t __read_vmcore(char *buffer, size_t buflen, 
> loff_t *fpos,
>               /* Read remaining elf notes */
>               tsz = min(elfcorebuf_sz + elfnotes_sz - (size_t)*fpos, buflen);
>               kaddr = elfnotes_buf + *fpos - elfcorebuf_sz - vmcoredd_orig_sz;
> -             if (copy_to(buffer, kaddr, tsz, userbuf))
> +             if (copy_to_user_or_kernel(buffer, kaddr, tsz, userbuf))
>                       return -EFAULT;
>   
>               buflen -= tsz;
> @@ -435,7 +421,7 @@ static ssize_t __read_vmcore(char *buffer, size_t buflen, 
> loff_t *fpos,
>   static ssize_t read_vmcore(struct file *file, char __user *buffer,
>                          size_t buflen, loff_t *fpos)
>   {
> -     return __read_vmcore((__force char *) buffer, buflen, fpos, 1);
> +     return __read_vmcore((__force char *) buffer, buflen, fpos, true);
>   }
>   
>   /*
> @@ -461,7 +447,7 @@ static vm_fault_t mmap_vmcore_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>       if (!PageUptodate(page)) {
>               offset = (loff_t) index << PAGE_SHIFT;
>               buf = __va((page_to_pfn(page) << PAGE_SHIFT));
> -             rc = __read_vmcore(buf, PAGE_SIZE, &offset, 0);
> +             rc = __read_vmcore(buf, PAGE_SIZE, &offset, false);
>               if (rc < 0) {
>                       unlock_page(page);
>                       put_page(page);
> diff --git a/include/linux/uaccess.h b/include/linux/uaccess.h
> index ac03940..a25e682e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/uaccess.h
> +++ b/include/linux/uaccess.h
> @@ -283,6 +283,7 @@ __copy_from_user_inatomic_nocache(void *to, const void 
> __user *from,
>   #endif              /* ARCH_HAS_NOCACHE_UACCESS */
>   
>   extern __must_check int check_zeroed_user(const void __user *from, size_t 
> size);
> +extern __must_check int copy_to_user_or_kernel(void *target, void *src, 
> size_t size, bool userbuf);

extern keyword is pointless for function prototypes, please don't add 
new ones.

>   
>   /**
>    * copy_struct_from_user: copy a struct from userspace
> diff --git a/lib/usercopy.c b/lib/usercopy.c
> index 7413dd3..7431b1b 100644
> --- a/lib/usercopy.c
> +++ b/lib/usercopy.c
> @@ -90,3 +90,18 @@ int check_zeroed_user(const void __user *from, size_t size)
>       return -EFAULT;
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(check_zeroed_user);
> +
> +/*
> + * Copy to either user or kernel space
> + */
> +int copy_to_user_or_kernel(void *target, void *src, size_t size, bool 
> userbuf)
> +{
> +     if (userbuf) {
> +             if (copy_to_user((char __user *) target, src, size))
> +                     return -EFAULT;
> +     } else {
> +             memcpy(target, src, size);
> +     }
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(copy_to_user_or_kernel);
> 

Ref my answer to Andrew, I don't think outlining this fonction is a 
worth it. As shown in that mail, the size of the caller is increased by 
4 instructions (which is in the noise) but also this new function is not 
small. So I see no benefit in term of size, and I don't think there is 
any benefit in terms of performance either.

In this patch that's the same. Before the patch, read_vmcore() has a 
size of 0x338.
With this patch, read_vmcore() has a size of 0x340. So that's 2 
instructions more, so no benefit either.

So I think this should remain an inline function like in your first 
patch (but with the new name).

000001a4 <copy_to_user_or_kernel>:
  1a4:  2c 06 00 00     cmpwi   r6,0
  1a8:  94 21 ff f0     stwu    r1,-16(r1)
  1ac:  41 82 00 50     beq     1fc <copy_to_user_or_kernel+0x58>
  1b0:  2c 05 00 00     cmpwi   r5,0
  1b4:  41 80 00 7c     blt     230 <copy_to_user_or_kernel+0x8c>
  1b8:  3d 00 b0 00     lis     r8,-20480
  1bc:  7f 83 40 40     cmplw   cr7,r3,r8
  1c0:  41 9c 00 14     blt     cr7,1d4 <copy_to_user_or_kernel+0x30>
  1c4:  40 82 00 64     bne     228 <copy_to_user_or_kernel+0x84>
  1c8:  38 60 00 00     li      r3,0
  1cc:  38 21 00 10     addi    r1,r1,16
  1d0:  4e 80 00 20     blr
  1d4:  7d 23 40 50     subf    r9,r3,r8
  1d8:  7f 85 48 40     cmplw   cr7,r5,r9
  1dc:  7c 08 02 a6     mflr    r0
  1e0:  90 01 00 14     stw     r0,20(r1)
  1e4:  41 9d 00 38     bgt     cr7,21c <copy_to_user_or_kernel+0x78>
  1e8:  48 00 00 01     bl      1e8 <copy_to_user_or_kernel+0x44>
                        1e8: R_PPC_REL24        __copy_tofrom_user
  1ec:  80 01 00 14     lwz     r0,20(r1)
  1f0:  2c 03 00 00     cmpwi   r3,0
  1f4:  7c 08 03 a6     mtlr    r0
  1f8:  4b ff ff cc     b       1c4 <copy_to_user_or_kernel+0x20>
  1fc:  7c 08 02 a6     mflr    r0
  200:  90 01 00 14     stw     r0,20(r1)
  204:  48 00 00 01     bl      204 <copy_to_user_or_kernel+0x60>
                        204: R_PPC_REL24        memcpy
  208:  38 60 00 00     li      r3,0
  20c:  80 01 00 14     lwz     r0,20(r1)
  210:  38 21 00 10     addi    r1,r1,16
  214:  7c 08 03 a6     mtlr    r0
  218:  4e 80 00 20     blr
  21c:  80 01 00 14     lwz     r0,20(r1)
  220:  7c 08 03 a6     mtlr    r0
  224:  4b ff ff a0     b       1c4 <copy_to_user_or_kernel+0x20>
  228:  38 60 ff f2     li      r3,-14
  22c:  4b ff ff a0     b       1cc <copy_to_user_or_kernel+0x28>
  230:  0f e0 00 00     twui    r0,0
  234:  7c 08 02 a6     mflr    r0
  238:  90 01 00 14     stw     r0,20(r1)


Also note that checkpatch.pl provides the following on your patch:

CHECK: No space is necessary after a cast
#88: FILE: fs/proc/vmcore.c:424:
+       return __read_vmcore((__force char *) buffer, buflen, fpos, true);

CHECK: extern prototypes should be avoided in .h files
#109: FILE: include/linux/uaccess.h:286:
+extern __must_check int copy_to_user_or_kernel(void *target, void *src, 
size_t size, bool userbuf);

CHECK: No space is necessary after a cast
#128: FILE: lib/usercopy.c:100:
+               if (copy_to_user((char __user *) target, src, size))

total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 3 checks, 96 lines checked

NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
       mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or 
--fix-inplace.

Commit 2c94767fa768 ("kdump: vmcore: remove copy_to() and add 
copy_to_user_or_kernel()") has style problems, please review.

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
       them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.


Christophe

Reply via email to