Michael Ellerman wrote:
Murilo Opsfelder Araújo <mopsfel...@gmail.com> writes:
On 3/23/22 08:51, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
+static inline bool can_single_step(u32 inst)
+{
+ switch (inst >> 26) {
Can't ppc_inst_primary_opcode() be used instead?
I didn't want to add a dependency on inst.h. But I guess I can very well
move this out of the header into some .c file. I will see if I can make
that work.
+ case 31:
+ switch ((inst >> 1) & 0x3ff) {
+ case 4: /* tw */
+ return false;
+ case 68: /* td */
+ return false;
+ case 146: /* mtmsr */
+ return false;
+ case 178: /* mtmsrd */
+ return false;
+ }
+ break;
+ }
+ return true;
+}
+
Can't OP_* definitions from ppc-opcode.h be used for all of these switch-case
statements?
Yes please. And add any that are missing.
We only have OP_31 from the above list now. I'll add the rest.
Thanks,
Naveen
