> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:29 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> +ex_sw: >> + /* Get the destination register number into r5 */ >> + lbui r5, r0, ex_reg_op; >> + /* Form store_word jump table offset (sw_table + (8 * regnum)) */ >> + la r6, r0, sw_table; >> + add r5, r5, r5; >> + add r5, r5, r5; >> + add r5, r5, r5; >> + add r5, r5, r6; >> + bra r5; > > Possibly stupid question: This is part of the unaligned store word > exception handler, yes? Shouldn't the above add's be addk's to > preserve the state of the carry register pre/post store? I don't think that addk is important. I have some tests for exception, I want to cover full exception handling. M _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
- Re: [PATCH 30/60] microblaz... Michal Simek
- Re: [PATCH 30/60] microblaz... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: [PATCH 26/60] microblaz... Thomas Gleixner
- Re: [PATCH 26/60] microblaz... Michal Simek
- Re: [PATCH 12/60] microblaz... Jon Loeliger
- Re: [PATCH 12/60] microblaz... Michal Simek
- RE: [PATCH 12/60] microblaz... Stephen Neuendorffer
- Re: [PATCH 12/60] microblaz... Michal Simek
- Re: [PATCH 12/60] microblaz... Jon Loeliger
- Re: [PATCH 08/60] microblaz... Ray Lee
- Re: [PATCH 08/60] microblaz... Michal Simek
- Re: [PATCH 08/60] microblaz... Ray Lee
- Re: [PATCH 08/60] microblaz... Michal Simek
- Re: [PATCH 07/60] microblaz... Adrian Bunk
- Re: [PATCH 07/60] microblaz... Michal Simek
- Re: [PATCH 02/60] microblaze_v4: Makefiles f... Adrian Bunk
- Re: [PATCH 02/60] microblaze_v4: Makefil... Michal Simek
- Re: [PATCH 02/60] microblaze_v4: Mak... Adrian Bunk
- Re: [PATCH 02/60] microblaze_v4... John Williams
- Re: [PATCH 01/60] microblaze_v4: Kconfig patches Paul Mundt
- Re: Microblaze init port v4 Adrian Bunk