On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 01:32:01PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 04:29:44PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > @@ -1010,14 +1009,21 @@ static int ads7846_setup_pendown(struct spi_device 
> > *spi,
> >             }
> >  
> >             ts->gpio_pendown = pdata->gpio_pendown;
> > -
> > -           if (pdata->gpio_pendown_debounce)
> > -                   gpio_set_debounce(pdata->gpio_pendown,
> > -                                     pdata->gpio_pendown_debounce);
> 
> Can we please change only this to:
> 
>                       gpiod_set_debounce(gpio_to_desc(pdata->gpio_pendown),
>                                          pdata->gpio_pendown_debounce);
> 
> and not change anything else (i.e. drop the changes below)?

Probably. I can try rollback this.

> >     } else {
> > -           dev_err(&spi->dev, "no get_pendown_state nor gpio_pendown?\n");
> > -           return -EINVAL;
> > +           struct gpio_desc *desc;
> > +
> > +           desc = devm_gpiod_get(&spi->dev, "pendown", GPIOD_IN);
> > +           if (IS_ERR(desc)) {
> > +                   dev_err(&spi->dev, "no get_pendown_state nor 
> > gpio_pendown?\n");
> > +                   return PTR_ERR(desc);
> > +           }
> > +           gpiod_set_consumer_name(desc, "ads7846_pendown");
> > +
> > +           ts->gpio_pendown = desc_to_gpio(desc);
> >     }
> > +   if (pdata->gpio_pendown_debounce)
> > +           gpiod_set_debounce(gpio_to_desc(ts->gpio_pendown),
> > +                              pdata->gpio_pendown_debounce);
> >  
> >     return 0;

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


Reply via email to