On Fri Jul 18 18:43:11 EST 2008, Guillaume Dargaud wrote:
Hello Milton and David, thanks for the answers.
This is a very reasonable approach, and is quite similar to what
I do.
Makes me feel better !!!
You actually have a few choices. You can put just the loaded
data, or you can put the elf file and parse the header in your
boot loader.
I cannot do that for memory constrains. I have 4Mb in the flash for the
kernel and only a few Kb for the eprom of the bootloader. Also the
idea is
to sometimes update the kernel but basically never the bootloader.
Then the zImage approach is definitly the way to go. Actually, dtbImage
now, because you want the device tree to be compiled and linked into it.
(It only took me 33 lines of assembly, and 6 were labels or blank, to
skip over the elf header -- the vmlinux and zImage don't require they be
moved into a specific place - but keeping it just a binary blob is
fine).
After seeing the advantages, I would keep the elf
header. One big advantage of keeping the elf header is you can
see how much data will be zeroed for bss when the kernel starts.
Another choice is rather than loading the kernel, build a zImage
of some kind (see the code in arch/powerpc/boot). This way the
kernel code and static data is compressed. I often see a 3-fold
reduction in size. You can also attach an initrd, should you
decide to use initramfs later. More o this below.
I'm not too familiar with the sequence of events that unfolds when the
kernel start.
The JTAG debugger copies the kernel at a given address. A program
dumps a
copy of that address range in flash. A bootloader does the reverse and
launches it, so it shouldn't really matter what form the kernel takes,
as
long as the original _did_ work.
Ok, should not be a problem. You will want the wrapper code to create a
flat binary image, so have your platform set the binary variable like
cuboot. Whatever you specify for your platform file will be linked at
the beginning of the image.
When choosing where to laod the zImage into memory, you should consider
that the linked kernel size (including its bss) needs to fit below the
load address, and the extracted device tree and random malloc heap
normally
reside the wrapper.
Ahh ... you are still on ppc. Please note that we just merged
the removal of arch/ppc, everyone needs to use powerpc now. The
Yes, my code works on the ML405, now I'm just trying to get it to work
on
our custom board... I haven't been able to follow closely the
PPC/PowerPC
change but it got me worried so I stopped updating at 2.6.15. I'm
using the
Xilinx git tree because I rely on a lot of their drivers, so I don't
know if
the change will be seemless. From the change of xparameters.h to and
entirely different device description method, I'd say I'm not ready to
take
the jump.
Any Xilinx user care to comment on that ?
I'm not a user, but from reading the list, they have integrated creating
the dts file into their build system.
And I'm supposed to release the alpha version of our code today !!!
good news is: its easier to state the requirements, and its
Hmmm...
easier to share the code in vmlinux. The bad news is you have to
follow the rules for passing data to the kernel. Its not hard.
We have defined a data structure that is parsed to become a tree
of data describing the machine, and based the contents on open
firmware. We call this the flattened device tree.
Our firmware is custom VHDL code. I'll go ask the 'tronics guy if it
fits
open firmware requirements, but I'd be surprised.
I'm sure your firmware does not presently create this tree, but
the dtbImage format is designed to be a delivery vehicle for it.
Please read Documentation/powerpc/booting-without-of for more
Will do. Last update is 2005. Is this still relevant ?
That's might be the last time we changed the structure of the tree,
but we have been updating the definition of what goes into the tree
structure pretty much every month since then. In the 2.6.27 kernel,
I think we started breaking out these descriptions into the
dts-bindings directory tree.
I will point out the minimal rom image I did for qemu where the
device tree is linked into the assembly, the kernel elf file is
already loaded, but I had to copy the nvram data serially into
ram and then poke the memory size and initrd location into the
device tree.
Maybe I can just use an elementary approach like that: have the
bootloader
write a single byte with the jumper positions somewhere in RAM, and
then
have the kernel read it to use for the Mac address. With the flat
addressing
it could work if there aren't built-in securities.
We are happy for you to read such information in the zImage (or
dtbImage).
In fact we have a hook "fixups" that is the designated place for this to
happen. If the location to read the jumper is well defined, I would
suggest doing all of it from your fixup function, you don't need to save
the jumper position in ram (less code for your bootloader, and probably
a simpler handoff). (Needing the mac address does mean you can't use
the
simpleboot.c).
Hope you find these comments helpful,
milton
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
