On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:31:33 -0700 (PDT) Victor Gallardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > From what I can tell, you don't even need this patch or the defconfig. > > Nothing differs at this point from Glacier other than the DTS. Since > > U-Boot is your loader, it should be able to pass the different DTS to a > > kernel that supports Cayonlands and have no issues. > > > > ... > > > > If you do want to have explicit support for Arches, that's fine. Look > > at how Yosemite is supported. It just reuses Bamboo. You could do the > > same. > > Yes, I like this idea. I'll do this. As you might have noticed, this has generated quite a bit of discussion on whether this is the right approach or not. If you can wait for a week, we plan on talking it over at OLS. Then I can give you a better idea as to whether we're going to stick with this or use a different approach. Overall your patches are fairly clean, so you've done a good job so far. Have a little patience with us as we figure out the right way to go :). josh _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev