On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 05:06:12AM -0800, Yury Norov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 09:07:20AM +0100, Herve Codina wrote:
...
> > + DECLARE_BITMAP(ts_mask_avail, 64);
> > + DECLARE_BITMAP(ts_mask, 64);
> > + DECLARE_BITMAP(map, 64);
> > + bitmap_from_u64(ts_mask_avail, ts_info->rx_ts_mask_avail);
> > + bitmap_from_u64(map, slot_map);
> We've got a BITMAP_FROM_U64() for this:
>
> DECLARE_BITMAP(ts_mask_avail, 64) = {
> BITMAP_FROM_U64(ts_info->rx_ts_mask_avail) };
> DECLARE_BITMAP(map, 64) = { BITMAP_FROM_U64(slot_map) };
This looks ugly. Can we rather provide a macro that does this under the hood?
Roughly:
#define DEFINE_BITMAP_64(name, src) \
DECLARE_BITMAP(name, 64) = { BITMAP_FROM_U64(src) }
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
