On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 03:51:37PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> The vm_flags of vma already checked under per-VMA lock, if it is a
> bad access, directly set fault to VM_FAULT_BADACCESS and handle error,
> no need to lock_mm_and_find_vma() and check vm_flags again, the latency
> time reduce 34% in lmbench 'lat_sig -P 1 prot lat_sig'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.w...@huawei.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/mm/fault.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> index 9bb9f395351a..405f9aa831bd 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> @@ -572,7 +572,9 @@ static int __kprobes do_page_fault(unsigned long far,
> unsigned long esr,
>
> if (!(vma->vm_flags & vm_flags)) {
> vma_end_read(vma);
> - goto lock_mmap;
> + fault = VM_FAULT_BADACCESS;
> + count_vm_vma_lock_event(VMA_LOCK_SUCCESS);
> + goto done;
> }
> fault = handle_mm_fault(vma, addr, mm_flags | FAULT_FLAG_VMA_LOCK,
> regs);
> if (!(fault & (VM_FAULT_RETRY | VM_FAULT_COMPLETED)))
I think this makes sense. A concurrent modification of vma->vm_flags
(e.g. mprotect()) would do a vma_start_write(), so no need to recheck
again with the mmap lock held.
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com>
