On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 04:52:15PM +0300, Lu Dai wrote:
> Make use of the __free() cleanup handler to automatically free nodes
> when they get out of scope.
> 
> Remove the need for a 'goto' as an effect.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lu Dai <dai...@exordes.com>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> Move the assignment of 'opal' to its declaration
> Seperate the declaration of 'np'
> 
>  drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_opal.c | 13 +++++--------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_opal.c b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_opal.c
> index 095c33ad10f8..c17e8343ea60 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_opal.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_opal.c
> @@ -327,19 +327,18 @@ static void udbg_init_opal_common(void)
>  
>  void __init hvc_opal_init_early(void)
>  {
> -     struct device_node *stdout_node = of_node_get(of_stdout);
> +     struct device_node *stdout_node __free(device_node) = 
> of_node_get(of_stdout);
>       const __be32 *termno;
>       const struct hv_ops *ops;
>       u32 index;
>  
>       /* If the console wasn't in /chosen, try /ibm,opal */
>       if (!stdout_node) {
> -             struct device_node *opal, *np;
> -
>               /* Current OPAL takeover doesn't provide the stdout
>                * path, so we hard wire it
>                */
> -             opal = of_find_node_by_path("/ibm,opal/consoles");
> +             struct device_node *opal __free(device_node) =
> +                     of_find_node_by_path("/ibm,opal/consoles");
>               if (opal) {

No blank line?

>                       pr_devel("hvc_opal: Found consoles in new location\n");
>               } else {
> @@ -350,13 +349,13 @@ void __init hvc_opal_init_early(void)
>               }
>               if (!opal)
>                       return;
> +             struct device_node *np;
>               for_each_child_of_node(opal, np) {

Ick, no, don't do that please.  Take some time and become more familiar
with kernel coding style and issues, perhaps work in drivers/staging/
first, before attempting to do stuff like this that is not correct.

thanks,

greg k-h

Reply via email to