On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 10:10:49AM +0800, Oliver Sang wrote: > I'm not sure I understand this test request. as in title, we see a good > improvement of aim7 for 1122c0c1cc, and we didn't observe other issues for > this commit.
The improvement suggests we are not sending cache flushes when we should send them, or at least just handle them in md. > do you mean this improvement is not expected or exposes some problems instead? > then by below patch, should the performance back to the level of parent of > 1122c0c1cc? > > sure! it's our great pleasure to test your patches. I noticed there are > [1] > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240625110603.50885-2-...@lst.de/ > which includes "[PATCH 1/7] md: set md-specific flags for all queue limits" > [2] > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240625145955.115252-2-...@lst.de/ > which includes "[PATCH 1/8] md: set md-specific flags for all queue limits" > > which one you suggest us to test? > do we only need to apply the first patch "md: set md-specific flags for all > queue limits" > upon 1122c0c1cc? > then is the expectation the performance back to parent of 1122c0c1cc? Either just the patch in reply or the entire [2] series would be fine. Thanks!
