> You should fix 52xx with the same for loop change then, since I
 > blatantly most of this file from you ;)

Heh, then factor out mpc5200_simple_probe() into a helper and use it
instead of copying it as ppc44x_probe?  ;)

If you stick to the NULL-terminated array version, then it becomes easy
to convert some other platform probing code to use your new code too, eg
tqm85xx_probe() could use an array too.

 - R.
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to