On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:33:06 -0700 Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You should fix 52xx with the same for loop change then, since I > > blatantly most of this file from you ;) > > Heh, then factor out mpc5200_simple_probe() into a helper and use it > instead of copying it as ppc44x_probe? ;) > > If you stick to the NULL-terminated array version, then it becomes easy > to convert some other platform probing code to use your new code too, eg > tqm85xx_probe() could use an array too. Except that logically doesn't make much sense. Why would you have a list of mpc52xx and 44x boards together? They require completely different kernels because the MMU and drive set is entirely different. Or am I totally missing what you are saying? josh _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev