On Friday 22 August 2008 05:38:54 Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Aug 19, 2008, at 5:36 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > From: Christian Ehrhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > This adds the guest portion of the hypercall infrastructure, > > basically an > > illegal instruction with a defined layout. > > See http://kvm.qumranet.com/kvmwiki/PowerPC_Hypercall_ABI for more > > detail > > on the hypercall ABI for powerpc. > > > > Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > --- > > > > [diffstat] > > kvm_para.h | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+) > > > > [diff] > > Can we make this more generic (naming) and location. I believe there > is some interesting in using the same ABI on the Freescale HV so it > seems like have the wrappers be a bit more generic saves us.
Agreed. Maybe something like epapr_hcalls.h . -- Hollis Blanchard IBM Linux Technology Center _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
